[182096] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Fri Jul 10 06:57:14 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <23291.1436511218@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 03:57:10 -0700
To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Jul 9, 2015, at 11:53 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>=20
> On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 23:33:25 -0700, Matthew Kaufman said:
>=20
>> One of the hopeful outcomes of IPv6 adoption was that an ISP could get
>> enough to last "forever" in a single transaction. But "forever" isn't
>> very long at one /48 (or more) per customer.
>=20
> How long does it take to blow through a /20 at /48 a customer?
A while. But the more likely case is that the guy before you asked for and g=
ot a /32, because that's the minimum (and already two steps up the fee scale=
, I might add)
You want ISPs to start with /20s? I'll support that over on PPML if you prop=
ose it. But I'll also ask for /20 to have a fee category of "small".
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)=
