[182082] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Jul 10 02:53:53 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 09 Jul 2015 23:33:25 -0700."
 <559F6735.7000603@matthew.at>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:53:38 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

--==_Exmh_1436511218_2867P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 23:33:25 -0700, Matthew Kaufman said:

> One of the hopeful outcomes of IPv6 adoption was that an ISP could get
> enough to last "forever" in a single transaction. But "forever" isn't
> very long at one /48 (or more) per customer.

How long does it take to blow through a /20 at /48 a customer?

--==_Exmh_1436511218_2867P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
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=j388
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1436511218_2867P--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post