[182064] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Thu Jul 9 21:02:41 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <49B19FFD-336B-46D2-BC41-4FC7BD58B63B@delong.com>
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 18:02:37 -0700
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Jul 9, 2015, at 4:07 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>> On Jul 9, 2015, at 15:45 , Ricky Beam <jfbeam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:05:00 -0400, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>>> Look again=E2=80=A6 IPv6 is already more than 20% of Google traffic in t=
he US.
>>=20
>> 20% of *1* site's traffic does not equal 20% DEPLOYMENT. (read: 20% of in=
ternet DEVICES (CPE) connected by IPv6)
>=20
> You are correct=E2=80=A6 In order for 20% of Google=E2=80=99s traffic to c=
ome from IPv6 connected devices, there would generally need to be more than 2=
0% of all devices connected over IPv6.
>=20
> Owen
>=20
That doesn't follow at all.
One guy who has v6 and really loves youtube can account for most of it.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)=
