[182058] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Jul 9 19:10:31 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.x1i3a0dytfhldh@rbeam.xactional.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 16:08:56 -0700
To: Ricky Beam <jfbeam@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Jul 9, 2015, at 15:55 , Ricky Beam <jfbeam@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:23:29 -0400, Naslund, Steve =
<SNaslund@medline.com> wrote:
>> That would be Tivo's fault wouldn't it.
>=20
> Partially, even mostly... it's based on Bonjour. That's why the shit =
doesn't work "over the internet".
>=20
> (It's just http/https, so it will, in fact, work, but their apps =
aren't designed to work that way. Many 3rd party control apps have no =
problems.)
Correct=E2=80=A6 It _IS_ TiVO=E2=80=99s fault. However, the reality =
I=E2=80=99m trying to point out is that application developers make =
assumptions based
on the commonly deployed environment that they expect in the world.
If we create a limited environment, then that is what they will code to.
If we deliver /48s, then they will come up with innovative ways to make =
use of those deployments. If we deliver /56s, then innovation will be =
constrained to what can be delivered to /56s, even for sites that have =
/48s.
Owen
