[182049] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Jul 9 18:06:26 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.x1i0aojitfhldh@rbeam.xactional.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 15:05:00 -0700
To: Ricky Beam <jfbeam@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Jul 9, 2015, at 14:50 , Ricky Beam <jfbeam@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:08:53 -0400, Marco Teixeira =
<admin@marcoteixeira.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Harald Koch <chk@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> The "common man" is becoming much more sophisticated in their =
networking
>>> requirements, and they need this stuff to just work. Please don't =
place
>>> artificially small limits just because you can't see a need.
>>=20
>> Probably because he got good advise from his father :)
>=20
> Indeed. Either someone else set it up, or he took the time to learn =
how to set it up himself. (kudos if the latter)
>=20
> THIS definitely makes him parsecs from the "common man" (there being =
7billion people in the world, and all.)
>=20
> Will a dozen networks be common (ie. out-of-the-box default) tomorrow? =
(NO) Next year? (NO) A decade from now? (maybe, and IPv6 deployment =
*might* be up to 20% by then)
Look again=E2=80=A6 IPv6 is already more than 20% of Google traffic in =
the US.
Owen
