[181987] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How to build an IPv6-only internal network?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Jul 9 07:31:44 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>,
Cryptographrix <cryptographrix@gmail.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:30:33 +0200
In-Reply-To: <D6403018-9291-45BA-9BEB-D8DAC2873F9F@cisco.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 8/Jul/15 22:23, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>
> (2) they use NAT64 (RFC 6146/6147) translation
The only issue with NAT64 is that you still need some IPv4 space.
If you can't get any anymore, despite all the millions of $$ in your
bank, then we'll see massively overlayed NAT, and perhaps service
providers selling "Quadruple Overlay NAT as a Service" :-\.
Mark.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=1mCX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
