[181836] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Attending NANOG65 question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Sun Jul 5 16:59:27 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2k2uebbip.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 16:59:16 -0400
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Jul 5, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>=20
> folk needing complex or difficult visas need long lead time. and they
> tend to need the registration and letter of invitation. in this case,
> canada is not all that much easier to get in to than the states. ietf
> is also working on improving this issue.
>=20
> randy
One of my frustrations with the NANOG website is it=E2=80=99s very PC =
oriented in how to navigate around it. The links are small and =
sometimes a bit obtuse, much like the posters on the list.
There=E2=80=99s generally not a big =E2=80=9Cregister here=E2=80=9D =
link, nor is the agenda featured prominently during the conference on =
the page.
OTOH, RIPE seems to have this done well. I visit the site, it shows me =
the agenda for $today() and the outcome is easy to interpret regardless =
of the device in-use.
I can still (attempt to) register for NANOG64 if you navigate to the =
right part of the site, but there=E2=80=99s no clear =E2=80=9CRegistration=
will be open X=E2=80=9D date. There seems to be no reason why I =
couldn=E2=80=99t pay now for the meeting, unless the transition from =
AMSL is still ongoing.
- Jared=
