[181820] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Jul 5 13:30:25 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Jul 2015 09:59:51 -0700."
<CAFFgAjBzbJY1poiOCRpUncTh0Jfg0RrMX=0eWwRXOqcpZ_Vn7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 13:27:18 -0400
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1436117238_26307P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 09:59:51 -0700, Mike Lyon said:
> I dont think my customers would see it that way. They would say, "we'll
> just go with ATT or Comcast instead." Poof, there goes that MRR!
Well, that *is* one way to reduce your dependence on IPv4. :)
--==_Exmh_1436117238_26307P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=G6hL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1436117238_26307P--
