[181792] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Jul 5 02:54:01 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "05 Jul 2015 03:41:26 -0000."
<20150705034126.10907.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 02:51:20 -0400
Cc: jmoore@atcnetworks.net, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1436079080_26307P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On 05 Jul 2015 03:41:26 -0000, "John Levine" said:
> Depends on the application(s). One that seems to work OK is to dual
> stack everyone and put them behind a NAT unless they ask to have a
> private IP.
Put their IPv4 behind a NAT and a globally routed /56.
There, FTFY. :)
--==_Exmh_1436079080_26307P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=EC7U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1436079080_26307P--
