[181756] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: leap second outage
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (frnkblk@iname.com)
Wed Jul 1 16:55:20 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: <frnkblk@iname.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <001b01d0b3f6$2c8d9f70$85a8de50$@iname.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:52:09 -0500
Reply-To: frnkblk@iname.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
And just 12.5% of them required TLC. =3D)
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of =
frnkblk@iname.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 7:05 AM
To: 'Stefan'
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: leap second outage
Yes, happened at 7 pm Central (0:oo UTC).
=20
From: Stefan [mailto:netfortius@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 10:30 PM
To: frnkblk@iname.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: leap second outage
=20
This was supposed to have happened @midnight UTC, right? Meaning that we =
are past that event. Under which scenarios should people be concerned =
about midnight local time? Lots of confusing messages flying all over... =
On Jun 30, 2015 10:13 PM, <frnkblk@iname.com <mailto:frnkblk@iname.com> =
> wrote:
We experienced our first leap second outage -- our SHE (super head end) =
is
using (old) Motorola encoders and we lost those video channels. They
restarted all those encoders to restore service.
Frank
