[181726] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Route leak in Bangladesh
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Wed Jul 1 11:09:28 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:03:36 -0400
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <5593FF18.3040903@foobar.org>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:54:16PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 01/07/2015 15:51, Mark Tinka wrote:
> > I found RPSL complicated a few years ago, and sort of put that on the
> > back-burner.
>
> you probably want to ignore more rpsl constructs and depend solely on
> as-sets, aut-nums and route/route6 objects. RPSL is not going to live up
> to your expectations.
Yes, like any technology there are lots of knobs that one could
use but are not recommended.
You just need these few objects and life will be simple.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.