[181656] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Route leak in Bangladesh
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Job Snijders)
Tue Jun 30 10:50:09 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:49:10 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
In-Reply-To: <5592A9F8.9090304@seacom.mu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 04:38:48PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On 30/Jun/15 16:24, Job Snijders wrote:
> > In this specific situation, for a small to medium sized network, it
> > might be prudent to apply an outbound prefix-filter on all transit &
> > peering sessions and thus only allowing prefixes which actually belong
> > to downstream customers and the network itself.
>
> I say that regardless of size, deploy the ultimate solution as the
> network is only bound to grow.
>
> It's harder for folk to undo old habits as they become more
> entrenched.
Nothing is ever regardless of anything :-)
I would forsee issues if i'd try to add an eleven megabyte prefix-list
on all devices in the network.
Kind regards,
Job
