[181653] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Route leak in Bangladesh
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Tue Jun 30 10:39:02 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:38:48 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20150630142443.GV95870@Vurt.local>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 30/Jun/15 16:24, Job Snijders wrote:
> In this specific situation, for a small to medium sized network, it
> might be prudent to apply an outbound prefix-filter on all transit &
> peering sessions and thus only allowing prefixes which actually belong
> to downstream customers and the network itself.
I say that regardless of size, deploy the ultimate solution as the
network is only bound to grow.
It's harder for folk to undo old habits as they become more entrenched.
Mark.
