[181553] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How long will it take to completely get rid of IPv4 or will it
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (manning)
Sat Jun 27 14:50:27 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: manning <bmanning@karoshi.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPz7E53sk2jrV8HpaZrsBkyT77WSxmbUWFXidiZrtS8sJhkqNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:48:06 -0700
To: Bacon Zombie <baconzombie@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Quite a few folks actually. (the 802.5 & 802.4 specs)=85.
This is kind of like asking when we will stop using ethernet framing =
(ethernet was designed for a 3Mbps transmission rate)
yet we are deploying 100Gbps networks. Still stuck on that 1500byte =
limitation. When can we get rid of that?
manning
bmanning@karoshi.com
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102
On 27June2015Saturday, at 9:49, Bacon Zombie <baconzombie@gmail.com> =
wrote:
> Is anybody still using IPX or TokenRing?
>=20
> I've heard that TokenRing is over 9000 times better for iSCSI since =
you are
> guaranteed that the packets will not get collisions.
> On 27 Jun 2015 18:39, "Fredy Kuenzler" <kuenzler@init7.net> wrote:
>=20
>> Am 27.06.2015 um 16:38 schrieb Bob Evans:
>>> We have a greater supply for packets to travel than we do for
>>> addresses required to move packets. Do you know how many packets a
>>> single IP address can generate or utilize, if it was attached too
>>> "The World's Fastest Internet" in someplace like Canadaland or =
Sweden
>>> on init7's Fiber7 ?
>>=20
>> Thanks for mentioning Fiber7, which is actually available in
>> Switzerland, not Sweden. And every Fiber7 customer gets a /48, too.
>>=20
>> --
>> Fredy Kuenzler
>>=20
>> ---------------------
>> Fiber7. No Limits.
>> https://www.fiber7.ch
>> ---------------------
>>=20
>> Init7 (Switzerland) Ltd.
>> AS13030
>> St.-Georgen-Strasse 70
>> CH-8400 Winterthur
>> Skype: flyingpotato
>> Phone: +41 44 315 4400
>> Fax: +41 44 315 4401
>> Twitter: @init7 / @kuenzler
>> http://www.init7.net/
>>=20
>>=20
