[181507] in North American Network Operators' Group
=?utf-8?Q?Re:_World's_Fastest_Internet=E2=84=A2_in_Canadaland?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Hammett)
Fri Jun 26 17:01:45 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:01:38 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <m2vbea2nnq.wl%randy@psg.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Some of those are why would one EVER need more than X, while others are why=
would one NOW need more than X. Big difference. Simple fact that there is =
no residential application that needs more than even 50 megabit much less 1=
0,000 megabit.=20
-----=20
Mike Hammett=20
Intelligent Computing Solutions=20
http://www.ics-il.com=20
Midwest Internet Exchange=20
http://www.midwest-ix.com=20
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>=20
To: "Rafael Possamai" <rafael@gav.ufsc.br>=20
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>=20
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 3:57:29 PM=20
Subject: Re: World's Fastest Internet=E2=84=A2 in Canadaland=20
> How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use?=20
we once asked how a home user would use 56kb, how anyone needed more=20
than 640k in a pee cee, how we would need more than 32 bits in an=20
address.=20
the only thing not rising is water levels. except the ocean, that is.=20
randy=20
