[181437] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tore Anderson)
Wed Jun 24 14:33:23 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:33:13 +0200
From: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
To: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa@latt.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150624160500.GC7191@puck.nether.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

* Majdi S. Abbas

> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 08:33:14AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> > Leap years and DST ladjustments have never caused us any major
> > issues. It seems these code paths are well tested and work fine.
> 
> 	I've seen quite a few people that for whatever reason insist
> on running systems in local time zones struggle with the DST reverse
> step.  It's not nearly as much of a non-issue as you claim.

Read again, and note the word "us". I am describing my and my
employer's experience with past DST changes and leap years, and those
have indeed been completely uneventful.

YMMV.

> > The leap second in 2012 however ... total and utter carnage.
> > Application servers, databases, etc. falling over like dominoes. All
> > hands on deck in the middle of the night to clean up. It took days
> > before we stopped finding broken stuff.
> 
> 	"Total and utter carnage" is a bit of a stretch.

As above, I am speaking only about how the 2012 leap second went down
in our infrastructure. I stand by how I described the event.

Again, YMMV. If you plan on let your infrastructure deal with the
upcoming leap second head-on, I wish you the best of luck. Hopefully
all the bugs from 2012 have been fixed. I, however, certainly have no
intention of being the one to find out otherwise.

Tore

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post