[181389] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Residential VSAT experiences?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hugo Slabbert)
Mon Jun 22 19:04:58 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:04:55 -0700
From: Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com>
To: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFFgAjC_VDBUa_fM1oe-WQ3R2_Xctg+PmOCLaByoFRgRtdMghA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--ftQmbtOmUf2cr8rB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Personally, 500-700ms of delay is well within distinguishable range and=20
causes challenges in verbal communication. If the speakers are both=20
expecting and accustomed to delay like that (e.g. sailors that are used to=
=20
being hundreds/thousands of miles away from anywhere and any other comms=20
solution sucks anyway), it could be workable.
For regular consumer/business voice applications, 100ms and lower is=20
decent, but above that starts to get into various degrees of suckage.
Just my 2c.
--=20
Hugo
On Mon 2015-Jun-22 15:54:49 -0700, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com> wrote:
>I never had good luck with VSAT and SIP. Maybe you had a better kit than I
>did :)
>
>-Mike
>
>
>On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Dovid Bender <dovid@telecurve.com> wrote:
>
>> Interesting that you say that about sip. We had a client that would use =
it
>> for sip on ships all the time. It wasn't the best but it worked. Ping ti=
mes
>> were between 500-700ms.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dovid
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com>
>> Sender: "NANOG" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org>Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:33:43
>> To: Nicholas Oas<nicholas.oas@gmail.com>; NANOG<nanog@nanog.org>
>> Subject: Re: Residential VSAT experiences?
>>
>> SIP will suck. VPN will suck. RDP will suck.
>>
>> Have you looked to see if you have any local wireless ISPs in your area?
>> Hit me up offlist if you want me to check for you.
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Nicholas Oas <nicholas.oas@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Would anyone mind sharing with me their first-hand experiences with
>> > residential satellite internet?
>> >
>> > Right now I am evaluating HughesNet Gen4 and ViaSat Exede and I'm
>> thinking
>> > specifically as a sysadmin who needs to use the uplink for work, not
>> surf.
>> >
>> > What are your experiences with the following applications?
>> > -SSH, (specifically interactive CLI shell access)
>> > -RDP
>> > -SIP over SSL
>> > -IPSec Tunneling (should be a non-starter due to latency)
>> > -GRE Tunneling
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> >
>> > -Nicholas
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Lyon
>> 408-621-4826
>> mike.lyon@gmail.com
>>
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
>>
>
>
>
>--=20
>Mike Lyon
>408-621-4826
>mike.lyon@gmail.com
>
>http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
--ftQmbtOmUf2cr8rB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=iIol
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ftQmbtOmUf2cr8rB--
