[181341] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network setup?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Hale)
Sun Jun 21 02:50:08 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <m2y4jdef08.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 23:50:04 -0700
From: Mike Hale <eyeronic.design@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: NANOG Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
A lot. It's a good point, but not very helpful to those engineers trying
to design said infrastructure.
On Jun 20, 2015 11:45 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> > So....ultimately, what's the answer? A huge number of low cost, low
> > power WAPs? Eager readers want to know. :)
>
> what was unclear about the following?
>
> Randy Bush wrote:
> > From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
> > Subject: Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network
> setup?
> > To: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com>
> > Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
> > Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 08:20:33 +0900
> > ...
> > having been in the back seat for many deployments over the years with
> > all sorts of kit, i have seen great and reliable pretty large
> > deployments of all of the above (well, xirrus only once). i have seen
> > embarrassing messes with all of the above. i have concluded that the
> > critical component is the engineer.
>
