[181335] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network setup?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Sun Jun 21 00:32:44 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 13:32:38 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <76FFD72B-0295-4CB3-A685-C004315A9273@puck.nether.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> My understanding is that the most recent NANOG had issues with clients
> picking channels sequentially vs by signal strength. There may have
> been other issues but when all devices use 149 because that's the
> first they can and they get link that's not good.
>
> If people know of tricks to solve this when there are 600-1000 devices
> per room i am certain the NANOG eng team would love to know about it.
not really; they're in denial. why did san antonio work; the only nanog
in 4 or more which did? why does ietf work?
wireless is ugly. few know how to deploy at scale. it's just not easy.
randy
