[181245] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Ghosts in our 6 New Ubiquity Pros - provision issues.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Luthman)
Fri Jun 19 10:26:36 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <85ad63b13d469068cf35b0c5c47f00d3@thefnf.org>
From: Josh Luthman <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:10:36 -0400
To: charles@thefnf.org
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
The current ToughCable really is fantastic. I'd only suggest the bigger
one ("carrier"). The old green stuff definitely deterred a lot of people,
understandably.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:05 AM, <charles@thefnf.org> wrote:
> On 2015-06-19 08:51, Mel Beckman wrote:
>
>> Bob, I've deployed tons of Ubiquiti gear, and have seen this problem
>> before. It always turns out to be poor quality cable installation. POE
>> does not tolerate low quality connectors, especially in outdoor
>> environments. There are many aspects to a quality cabling job, so the
>> best thing you can do is seek out a qualified installer with outdoor
>> POE experience.
>>
>>
>
>
> Yep. Networks. Layer 1 before everything else! So many bad cabling jobs
> for sure.
>
>
> Are people using the tough cable? That has held up really well in the
> installations I've done. For a few years with zero issues.
>
