[181084] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Taht)
Mon Jun 15 15:06:16 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <557F1948.6080506@foobar.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:05:55 -0700
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> On 15/06/2015 19:09, William Herrin wrote:
>> Anycast + TCP =3D much pain, for reasons which should be obvious.
>
> This was presented at some conference or other a couple of years ago:
>
>> https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog37/presentations/matt.levine.pdf
From that otherwise encouraging preso:
"What about IPv6? We have a plan! We plan to be dead before customers
demand IPv6".
I am pretty sure the authors are still alive(?).
I have been using anycast at a small scale on mesh networks, for dns,
primarily. Works.
> Nick
>
>
--=20
Dave T=C3=A4ht
What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast
