[180856] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for information on IGP choices in dual-stack networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Jun 11 03:00:34 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Sameer Khosla <skhosla@neutraldata.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:56:01 +0200
In-Reply-To: <24422.1433887245@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/Jun/15 00:00, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>
> But in that case, don't they usually say "The heck with it" and continue
> using 2 separate ASN numbers?
We tried the multiple AS thing once, many years ago at $previous_job.
It's cool on paper.
We collapsed back into a single AS. Will never touch that sauce again.
Mark.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=HlQJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
