[180853] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for information on IGP choices in dual-stack networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Jun 11 02:50:50 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Sameer Khosla <skhosla@neutraldata.com>,
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:50:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <49A81EB09F493442B6D259E36251192C01719F1F6A@ndcc-exch1.neutraldata.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 9/Jun/15 23:55, Sameer Khosla wrote:
> Think of scenarios where you have mergers/acquisitions where different portions of the now amalgamated network were designed differently and there may be too much pain or require too much time to redesign rather than bolt together and redistribute.
In such cases, BGP-LS may be a better approach, as that encourages more
sane filtering in the IGP than an IGP generally would.
Mark.
