[180814] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul B. Henson)
Wed Jun 10 17:43:32 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
To: "'Lorenzo Colitti'" <lorenzo@colitti.com>
In-reply-to: <CAKGbBmmYi3h9sSJgjfg4fvaJDtwa+H_7Ava_XMkK+rdaC5hOdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:34:46 -0700
Cc: 'NANOG List' <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

> From: Lorenzo Colitti
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 5:07 AM
>=20
> getting rid of NAT. Today in IPv4, tethering just works, period.
[...]
> IPv4-only apps always work.

Wow. If your phone just "always works", you certainly lead a charmed =
life.

> A model where the device has to request resources from the network =
before
> enabling tethering, or before supporting IPv4-only apps, provides a =
much
> worse user experience. The user might have to wait a long time, or the
> operation might even fail.

Far better that the user stare at the useless android brick in their =
hand that is incapable of connecting to the network at all.

Maybe you should try taking a poll of actual users? Dear user, would you =
rather:

A) have a phone that connects to the network and the most part works =
barring some side cases

B) have a phone that is incapable of connecting, but saves you from =
being unable to use certain functionality that otherwise would have been =
unavailable. By preventing you from using any functionality at all.



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post