[180808] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Doug Barton)
Wed Jun 10 17:23:25 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:19:56 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CALFTrnM6BDWjLsSvDO4io70pWDL+Omf+VsSQML1nQS_SNRFWGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--gatGnCmNgPhHV74pDO8pDxNWRmSc5ebG7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 6/10/15 8:15 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> The statement that "Android would still not implement DHCPv6 NA, but it=
> would implement DHCPv6 PD." is troubling because you're not even willin=
g to
> entertain the idea for reasons that are rooted in idealism rather
> than pragmatism.
I was going to respond on this issue in more depth, but others have=20
already gotten there ahead of me. I think Ray's paragraph above sums it=20
up best.
Doug
--=20
I am conducting an experiment in the efficacy of PGP/MIME signatures.=20
This message should be signed. If it is not, or the signature does not=20
validate, please let me know how you received this message (direct, or=20
to a list) and the mail software you use. Thanks!
--gatGnCmNgPhHV74pDO8pDxNWRmSc5ebG7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVeKn8AAoJEFzGhvEaGryEHdoH/RJXJo6AJradK5OF/CXquMxy
sFt6aF6fXBS7WThwz/8SbGIrNcjKjCvmcHxOHfOww6h12oO1lSAfqnfcEaFuBa9j
Ydy2VHaIsotrncwoH5Ee2MfYT8mzOyDDMZU9Z6tZJhV2RV32jvOlFEXYzgYk8sL3
iKG+Ng08+5bSYeevdjcGUSUwa9ovsF9qVwbNGVW+BpI7j69Mb7TUUWfA3fTXi/wk
r9g2STT8VRjepRdYhnivYhS4ofYSozCrol5h7cJr510Q35eusSPX6vAt/UyrYsyX
z1pmaFDyCJTPVTXIv2myRgI9yl1jLyfVLlEKx3RkA2Dp8EIiNO4XfSuHJmyd3lI=
=B8Z1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gatGnCmNgPhHV74pDO8pDxNWRmSc5ebG7--
