[180759] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Routing Insecurity (Re: BGP in the Washington Post)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Russ White)
Wed Jun 10 09:20:58 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Russ White" <russw@riw.us>
To: "'Randy Bush'" <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2381zpxvf.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:17:36 -0400
Cc: 'North American Network Operators' Group' <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


> rtfm.  bgpsec key aggregation is at the descretion of the operator.
> they could use one key to cover 42 ASs.

I've been reading the presentations and the mailing lists, both of which
imply you should use one key per router for security reasons. I would tend
to agree with that assessment, BTW. 

Russ 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post