[180699] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Jun 9 23:10:19 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:59:47 +1000."
<1433905187.11511.25.camel@karl>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 23:09:34 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1433905774_7142P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:59:47 +1000, Karl Auer said:
> On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 11:48 +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> > With stateful DHCPv6 addressing, we're back to using NAT again.
>
> Hope the question doesn't make me look like an idiot, but why does using
> stateful DHCPv6 mean having to go back to NAT?
How does the device ask for a *second* DHCPv6'ed address for tethering or
whatever?
--==_Exmh_1433905774_7142P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=NUNS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1433905774_7142P--
