[180391] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Jun 1 20:12:06 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <083301d09cc1$82342120$869c6360$@tndh.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:10:12 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net> wrote:
> True, but it does represent a business decision to choose IPv6. The relevant
> point here is that the "NEXT" facebook/twitter/snapchat/... is likely being
> pushed by clueless investors into outsourcing their infrastructure to
> AWS/Azure/Google-cloud.
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.snapchat.com. 3433 IN CNAME ghs.google.com.
ghs.google.com. 21599 IN CNAME ghs.l.google.com.
ghs.l.google.com. 299 IN A 64.233.176.121
snapchat seems to be doing just fine on 'google cloud services' though? oh:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.snapchat.com. 3388 IN CNAME ghs.google.com.
ghs.google.com. 21599 IN CNAME ghs.l.google.com.
ghs.l.google.com. 299 IN AAAA 2607:f8b0:4002:c06::79
ha!
