[180351] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP in the Washngton Post
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Max Tulyev)
Mon Jun 1 12:56:47 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 19:56:28 +0300
From: Max Tulyev <maxtul@netassist.ua>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGXCgO2mLXHHLC5kD60-vpALPUT7=oBdUkkg2Vp3iouGhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Is there *IN THEIORY* any possibility to make BGP secure enough now?
Yes, RPKI protects from fat fingered people, but NOT protects from
people doing hijacks knowlingly.
The global routing registry really can be the solution, but it
automatically gives one authority a power to cut off any network.
Imagine how fast it will be used for censorship.
On 01.06.15 16:24, William Herrin wrote:
> Interesting story about BGP and security in the Washington Post today:
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/business/2015/05/31/net-of-insecurity-part-2/
>
> -Bill
>
