[180250] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Fri May 29 11:23:53 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <C3FD8B0F-0CC7-4CAB-8168-4A328BA1E95B@delong.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 11:23:50 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: luan.nguyen@dimensiondata.com, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> Yeah, if it were LISP, they could probably handle IPv6.
why can't they do v6 with any other encap?
the encap really doesn't matter at all to the underlying ip protocol
used, or shouldn't... you decide at the entrance to the 'virtual
network' that 'thingy is in virtual-network-5 and encap the packet...
regardless of ip version of the thing you are encapsulating.
