[180120] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Keith Medcalf)
Mon May 25 08:44:16 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 06:44:10 -0600
In-Reply-To: <CAOLsBOt_SOwHLZVRgb31nMMX5isiS8rkXojUpP9NyNVU05Dw9w@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf@dessus.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Cc: Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Without a concomitant increase in "trustworthy", assigning greater levels o=
f trust is fools endeavour. Whatever this trusted network initiative is, I=
take that it was designed by fools or government (the two are usually ind=
istinguishable) for the purpose of creating utterly untrustworthy networks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ramy Hashish
> Sent: Sunday, 24 May, 2015 22:49
> To: morrowc.lists@gmail.com; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks
>
> The idea of restricting access to a certain content during an attack on
> the
> "trusted networks" only will make all interested ISPs be more "trusted"
>
> Ramy
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Christopher Morrow
> <morrowc.lists@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 9:12 PM, jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> However, the trusted network initiative might be a good approach to
> > start
> > >> influencing operators to apply anti-spoofing mechanisms.
> > >>
> >
> > explain how you think the 'trusted network initiative' matters in the
> > slightest?
> >
> > -chris
> >
