|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 21:38:11 +0300 From: Max Tulyev <maxtul@netassist.ua> To: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <20150518180414.GC13453@bongo.bofh.it> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org How much false positives (i.e. blackholing traffic users want to reach)? On 18.05.15 21:04, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 17, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Any ISPs out there (big or small) ever used the Spamhaus BGP feed to >> prevent against botnet, spam, etc? If so, how has your experience been? Is >> it worthwhile? Has it helped? On / off list responses are appreciated in >> advance. > We use Spamhaus DROP (not the BGP version: our software asks a human to > review each change). > The benefits are not obvious since we do not have access customers, but > it will blackhole some networks you obviously do not want to talk to, > and it has not caused any troubles either. >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |