[17998] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RBL Update (Re: Lets go vixie!! rbl)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (NetSurfer)
Fri Jun 19 20:09:27 1998
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 19:51:39 -1000 (HST)
From: NetSurfer <netsurf@sersol.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <v03007803b1af225829ca@[198.3.136.121]>
If this interpretation was correct don't you think that given this
litiguous society and some spammers such as Stinkus.com who have sued
before, that *someone* would have filed suit by now?
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Dean Anderson wrote:
Yes. Any spam blocking when you aren't a party to the email is illegal. You
are an attorney. Come on. This isn't relevent. Nor is it a departure from
anything I have said, previously.
--
James D. Wilson
netsurf@sersol.com
"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem"
William of Ockham (1285-1347/49)
