[179965] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Spamhaus BGP feed experiences?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marco d'Itri)
Mon May 18 14:04:37 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 20:04:14 +0200
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAFFgAjDhUpkTx25Ox4kB+NzNA0BgUABE_w8MyYjPXmbzzHqdgg@mail.gmail.com>
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On May 17, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any ISPs out there (big or small) ever used the Spamhaus BGP feed to
> prevent against botnet, spam, etc? If so, how has your experience been? Is
> it worthwhile? Has it helped? On / off list responses are appreciated in
> advance.
We use Spamhaus DROP (not the BGP version: our software asks a human to=20
review each change).
The benefits are not obvious since we do not have access customers, but=20
it will blackhole some networks you obviously do not want to talk to,
and it has not caused any troubles either.
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=pU5M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC--
