[179959] in North American Network Operators' Group
survey on performance measurement platforms and related standards
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bajpai, Vaibhav)
Mon May 18 09:22:22 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Bajpai, Vaibhav" <v.bajpai@jacobs-university.de>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 13:22:14 +0000
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--Apple-Mail=_0D5AE29B-B3AD-488E-A9A8-93615FB0F50B
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Dear NANOG,
I would like to share something with you today.
As you know, IETF LMAP [1] is making efforts to standardize large-scale
measurements to allow divergent measurement platforms to converge =
towards
interoperability. Early discussions within this group often lead to =
folks
asking for feature sets and possibilities of each contemporary =
performance
measurement platform. So we started digging literature work in this =
space and
found that although there were surveys on topology-based measurement =
platforms
(such CAIDA Ark et al.); literature work on performance measurement =
platforms
(such as RIPE Atlas, SamKnows et al.) was missing.
Therefore, we started writing such a survey in 2013 to plug this gap and =
also
complement this with current state of IETF standardization efforts =
happening
within the LMAP and IPPM working groups.
This work got published and came online recently.
I thought would share this with you:
=
----------------8<-----------------8<-----------------8<-----------------8=
<
A Survey on Internet Performance Measurement Platforms and Related =
Standardization Efforts
Vaibhav Bajpai, J=C3=BCrgen Sch=C3=B6nw=C3=A4lder
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
April, 2015
A number of Internet measurement platforms have emerged in the last few =
years.
These platforms have deployed thousands of probes at strategic locations
within access and backbone networks and behind residential gateways. In =
this
paper we provide a taxonomy of these measurement platforms on the basis =
of
their deployment use-case. We describe these platforms in detail by =
exploring
their coverage, scale, lifetime, deployed metrics and measurement tools,
architecture and overall research impact. We conclude the survey by =
describing
current standardization efforts to make large-scale performance =
measurement
platforms interoperable.
Author Copy: =
http://vaibhavbajpai.com/documents/papers/proceedings/lsmp-comst-2015.pdf
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2418435
=
----------------8<-----------------8<-----------------8<-----------------8=
<
Thanks!
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lmap
Best, Vaibhav
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D
Vaibhav Bajpai
Research I, Room 91
Computer Networks and Distributed Systems (CNDS) Lab
School of Engineering and Sciences
Jacobs University Bremen, Germany
www.vaibhavbajpai.com
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D
--Apple-Mail=_0D5AE29B-B3AD-488E-A9A8-93615FB0F50B
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVWeeGAAoJEHR3XKwTWKOZ0QcH/iV1P0qH2/COqDLW/2tYxkk+
jChkgJKy79pDtG2toJDxwnLoK2TbGvIAJrk5kZTxz4HKog30Vor6DzK6VYpxH8MW
b5xSY4daa/0JBe5bw6fkogDzwjV7Ok51yHrMN/BvK8UBAnh0+LdvZOBL1Fif6H6H
un/ou52XiQTsQCqgyyYDjm33XOEq77bX4gVcSlEFlnQBDwMXEfY7HBKb5WtgfZp/
Rn9jQCzd22aKWxFGIGyIGqMl6ibHovuPQPuQdVFRZYN1YWzNQMWUH03/k/ws87t9
n0eyY6R2paOpRVf37xXpXyVT/94QyHvxzqksSOTocd61844TsnUV9dC/dMGZuJs=
=RXjM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_0D5AE29B-B3AD-488E-A9A8-93615FB0F50B--
