[179953] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Visualware/Speedtest self-hosting alternatives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arzhel Younsi)
Sun May 17 17:06:39 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Arzhel Younsi <xionox@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:06:31 +1200
In-Reply-To: <5468724.hL1GFEGn8d@linne>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I think http://www.perfsonar.net/ does what you're looking for and more.
--
Arzhel
On Mon, May 18, 2015, at 03:39, Karsten Thomann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am Sonntag, 17. Mai 2015, 08:33:28 schrieb Miles Fidelman:
> > Durga Dash wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Are there any turn key solutions out there like Visualware's MCS which you
> > > can install in a datacenter and let customers check overall
> > > throughput/latency and other metrics from their locations to the
> > > datacenter?
> > Didn't you just answer your own question? (Visualware MCS).
> >
> > Of course if all you're interested in is throughput and latency, there's
> > ping, traceroute, mtr, iperf, etc. - all of which let customers check
> > performance without needing anything special at the datacenter, other
> > than a host to ping against.
> >
> > Miles Fidelman
>
> I've not compared the features of the products, but a possible
> alternative should be
> http://www.ookla.com/netgauge
>
> Karsten
