[179951] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Visualware/Speedtest self-hosting alternatives

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Miles Fidelman)
Sun May 17 08:33:33 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 08:33:28 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <BEDA5F44C8D93042A6DB4F4EEBCE94C237A961C1@USALWEXMBX3.infor.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

Durga Dash wrote:
> Hi,
> Are there any turn key solutions out there like Visualware's MCS which you can install in a datacenter and let customers check overall throughput/latency and other metrics from their locations to the datacenter?
>

Didn't you just answer your own question? (Visualware MCS).

Of course if all you're interested in is throughput and latency, there's 
ping, traceroute, mtr, iperf, etc. - all of which let customers check 
performance without needing anything special at the datacenter, other 
than a host to ping against.

Miles Fidelman






-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post