[179910] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Recommended 10GE ISCSI SAN switch
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lumir Srchlm)
Tue May 12 11:25:56 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <555201CB.7060900@winterei.se>
To: "Paul S." <contact@winterei.se>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Lumir Srchlm <srchlm@its.cz>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:25:52 +0200
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
We use IBM / Lenovo switches for such traffic. Very low latency, rear to=20
front or front to rear airflow models, large buffers, FCoE, OpenFlow=20
support, great price-performance...
G8124E or G8272 may be the right models, use DAC cables instead of SFP+ if =
possible.
Lumir
From: "Paul S." <contact@winterei.se>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: 12.05.2015 15:39
Subject: Recommended 10GE ISCSI SAN switch
Sent by: "NANOG" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org>
Hi guys,
We're shortly going to be getting some 10G SANs, and I was wondering=20
what people were using as SAN switches for 10G SANs.
It is my understanding that low buffer sizes make most 'normal' 10G=20
ethernet switches unsuitable for the job.
We're pretty much an exclusive Juniper shop, but are not biased in any=20
way -- best tool for the job is what I've been tasked with to find.
Keeping that in mind, how would something like a EX4550 fare in the=20
role? Are there better devices in the same price range?
Thanks!
Obsah t=E9to zpr=E1vy, stejn=EC jako obsah souvisej=EDc=ED osobn=ED a telef=
onick=E9=20
komunikace z=E1stupc=F9 a zam=ECstnanc=F9 spole=E8nosti ITS slou=BE=ED v=FD=
lu=E8n=EC jako=20
prost=F8edek k v=FDm=ECn=EC informac=ED a, nen=ED-li to v nich v=FDslovn=EC=
uvedeno,=20
nejsou pr=E1vn=EDm jedn=E1n=EDm zakl=E1daj=EDc=EDm z=E1vaznou nab=EDdku, vz=
nik, zm=ECnu nebo=20
z=E1nik pr=E1v =E8i pr=E1vn=EDch n=E1sledk=F9 anebo jedn=E1n=EDm sm=EC=F8uj=
=EDc=EDm bezprost=F8edn=EC k=20
uzav=F8en=ED smlouvy a spole=E8nost ITS nenese jakoukoliv odpov=ECdnost za =
d=F9sledky =E8i =FAjmu vzniklou neuzav=F8en=EDm smlouvy.
