[179863] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Keith Medcalf)
Sat May 9 11:05:54 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 09:05:48 -0600
In-Reply-To: <20150508063922.47C152DF2D66@rock.dv.isc.org>
From: "Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf@dessus.com>
To: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Ah. Security hole as designed. inline dispositions should be ignored unle=
ss the recipient specifically "requests" to see them after viewing the text=
/plain part. In fact, I would vote for ignoring *everything* except the te=
xt/plain part unless the recipient specifically requests it after viewing t=
he text/plain part. No test/plain? Delete without further ado.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews
> Sent: Friday, 8 May, 2015 00:39
> To: Paul Ferguson
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject:
>
>
> In message <mailman.3786.1431050203.12477.nanog@nanog.org>, Paul Ferguson
> via N
> ANOG writes:
> >
> > Does anyone any else find it weird that the last dozen or so messages
> > from the list have been .eml attachments?
>
> Nanog is encapsulating messages that are DKIM signed. Your mailer may
> not be properly handling
>
> Content-Type: message/rfc822
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Mark
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
