[179675] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: vendor spam OTD
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Apr 28 18:09:32 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:39:12 -0400."
<21823.47024.673166.569627@world.std.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:09:23 -0400
Cc: Rob Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1430258963_2098P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:39:12 -0400, Barry Shein said:
> Email is already on the verge of useless. And a lot of that is just
> pitches from orgs one would, under old definitions, argue are not
> spam.
That prompts two questions: (a) How do you define "useless" and (b) what
do you advocate as a replacement?
(You want to stress-test your MUA, subscribe to the linux-kernel mailing
list, which runs anywhere from 700 to 1100 posts. Per day. And the list
is well-run, we see single-digits of spam per week.)
--==_Exmh_1430258963_2098P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=+fJA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1430258963_2098P--
