[179599] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering and Network Cost
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Max Tulyev)
Tue Apr 21 05:58:23 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:58:16 +0300
From: Max Tulyev <maxtul@netassist.ua>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAPkb-7DQN8SBH5mhuQ8gj=TY3F+N3fj_3qSbgpMNpdXap4RKoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Choose another IX to peer. Or even make your own ;)
Kiev have 3 major IXes, and price is about $100 for 10GE port.
On 19.04.15 12:23, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> So why is IX peering so expensive?
>
> Again if I look at my local IX (dix.dk) they have about 40 networks
> connected. Each network pays minimum 5800 USD a year. That gives them a
> budget of 240000+ USD a year.
>
> But the only service is running an old layer 2 switch.
>
> Why do these guys deserve to be paid that much for so little?
>
> Recently we had a competitor show up in the form of Netnod. However the
> pricing is almost exactly the same, although Netnod tries to deliver
> slightly more service.
>
> Seems to me that this an unsound market. The 40 dix particants should
> donate 1000 USD once and get a new layer 2 switch. Why does that not happen?
>
> Does not look like it is a local phenomenon either. IX'es all over are way
> more expensive than they should be.
>
> Regards
>
> Baldur
>
