[17951] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RBL Update (Re: Lets go vixie!! rbl)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jon Lewis)
Thu Jun 18 00:43:28 1998
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:31:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
Reply-To: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
To: Steve Sobol <sjsobol@shell.nacs.net>
cc: Derek Balling <dredd@megacity.org>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <19980617193438.19218@shell.nacs.net>
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Steve Sobol wrote:
> > I would have to agree with this, but I would say that the caveat is that
> > the ISP should notify the customer (somewhere, anywhere) that they use the
> > RBL (or at least that the ISP reserves the right to block domains and/or
>
> The agreement Paul Vixie makes RBL users sign states that EXPLICITLY.
> You are not allowed to use the RBL unless you disclose such use fully to
> your customers and/or downstreams.
The agreement explicitly says nothing of the sort. At least not the one I
signed. Did you look at the one you signed? Did you sign one?
fdt-gw#The agreement Paul Vixie makes RBL users sign states that EXPLICITLY
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
Can we please argue about the merits/evils of the RBL elsewhere?
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Spammers will be winnuked or
Network Administrator | drawn and quartered...whichever
Florida Digital Turnpike | is more convenient.
______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key____
