[179419] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Apr 13 17:27:34 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQQ6br027pyJdp_B7BkkfKTYfu6rjQAh+9OhgaO9jMFaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:23:09 -0700
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Now if only T-Mobile would launch IPv6 for I-Devices!!
No, blaming Apple for not implementing your chosen transition mechanism =
is not a valid excuse.
Owen
> On Apr 13, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Good news (that i have not personally verified) !
>=20
> Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, and AT&T all launched the Samsung Galaxy S6 =
with
> IPv6 on by default.
>=20
> Given the growth and importance of mobile to Internet, it is great to =
see
> this progress from the mobile carriers.
>=20
> Just for those keeping score, of the top 10 Alexa website for the USA,
> these major websites prefer IPv6 or prefer NAT44 / NAT64 from the =
mobile
> networks
>=20
> 1. Google -- prefers IPv6
> 2. Facebook -- prefers IPv6
> 3. Youtube -- prefers IPv6
> 4. Amazon -- prefers NAT -- :(
> 5. Yahoo! -- prefers IPv6
> 6. Wikipedia -- prefers IPv6
> 7. Twitter -- prefers NAT -- :(
> 8. Ebay -- prefers NAT -- :(
> 9. Linkedin -- prefers IPv6
> 10. Reddit -- prefers NAT -- :(
>=20
> Dear Amazon, Twitter, Ebay, and Reddit -- please consider this your
> personal invitation to introduce IPv6 to your service.
