[179307] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Consumer products with baked-in VLAN tagging
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Taht)
Wed Apr 8 13:58:15 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <552115A7.9060508@foobar.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 10:58:12 -0700
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: Robert Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> On 05/04/2015 03:32, Robert Seastrom wrote:
>> As you may know if you've played around with recent Apple Airports
>> (Express at least) in bridge mode with "guest network" turned on, they
>> seem to know about 802.1q and have fairly reasonable or at least
>> defensible behavior out of the box - that is to say they move the
>> "native" SSID as untagged, and the "guest" SSID tagged 802.1q VLAN
>> 1003.
>>
>> This behavior does not appear to be field-modifyable.
I do wish they had bufferbloat-fighting queue managment on the ISP
side, it is otherwise
pretty good hardware.
Do they also supply that vlan to the ethernet?
How is their ipv6 with comcast?
> Didn't know about that trick.
>
> I'm going to immediately enable vlan 1003 on the cisco switch that my
> express is connected to.
>
> Nick
--=20
Dave T=C3=A4ht
We CAN make better hardware, ourselves, beat bufferbloat, and take
back control of the edge of the internet! If we work together, on
making it:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/onetswitch/onetswitch-open-source-hard=
ware-for-networking
