|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <CALFTrnOEo1oDUGWFamnvhToR4eE+s7BX=318xE9iJHzVwFE7Xw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:57:41 +0200 From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com> To: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org This reminds me that we have switches that will tag DHCPv6 packets with the equallent to option 82 however ISC-DHCP has no support for it. The switch will create a DHCP packet with two options, one being the user info and the other is encapsulating the original packet. ISC-DHCP will pick the encapsulated original packet and then ignore the user info from the outer packet, so it is useless. But if the most popular server is useless, how are people doing this? Regards Baldur
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |