[179155] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP offloading (fixing legacy router BGP scalability issues)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Colin Johnston)
Thu Apr 2 04:00:31 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <551CF2DD.6080805@seacom.mu>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 09:00:24 +0100
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
customers are paying for good traffic to generate eye balls and revenue, =
not bad traffic which clouds the good work done.
I know we are getting into filtering traffic wars here but if the source =
admins refuse to respond, refuse to cooperate, then if 100% of the =
traffic is bad then why not put up walls.
I would like country trade talks to get down to the technical point that =
there are some fundamental problems being seen with bad traffic usage =
and it is significant percentage of waste bandwidth.
Colin
=20
> On 2 Apr 2015, at 08:42, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On 2/Apr/15 09:35, Colin Johnston wrote:
>> or ignore/block russia and north korea and china network blocks
>> takes away 5% of network ranges for memory headroom, especially the =
large number of smaller china blocks.
>> Some may say this is harsh but is the network contacts refuse to =
co-operate with abuse and 100% of the traffic is bad then why not
>=20
> I think that's a little extreme, especially since customers are paying
> me to deliver packets to the whole Internet.
>=20
> But that's just me...
>=20
> Mark.
