[179152] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP offloading (fixing legacy router BGP scalability issues)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Apr 2 03:44:08 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 09:42:21 +0200
in-reply-to: <A6DA8967-5E97-47FF-B97F-46462DBD37A5@gt86car.org.uk>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 2/Apr/15 09:35, Colin Johnston wrote:
> or ignore/block russia and north korea and china network blocks
> takes away 5% of network ranges for memory headroom, especially the large number of smaller china blocks.
> Some may say this is harsh but is the network contacts refuse to co-operate with abuse and 100% of the traffic is bad then why not
I think that's a little extreme, especially since customers are paying
me to deliver packets to the whole Internet.
But that's just me...
Mark.
