[179010] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Yardiel D. Fuentes)
Mon Mar 23 19:00:22 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Yardiel D. Fuentes <yardiel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 19:00:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <88F2A9A6-1B7C-4B6E-BD79-390945C48B1E@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Thank you all who have contributed your feedback, comments and =
discussion points towards the DDoS/DoS attack BCOP.=20
I have updated the current version of the BCOP with the agreed upon =
feedback:
http://bcop.nanog.org/index.php/BCOP_Drafts
Since there have been good feedback for this BCOP. The committee decided =
to extend the "last-call period" for another two weeks to give ample =
chance to further feedback.
So, it is not late for more comments,
Yardiel Fuentes
On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Yardiel D. Fuentes wrote:
>=20
>=20
> Hello NANOGers,
>=20
> Following up on the below effort from last year, the DDoS/DoS Attack =
BCOP Draft document is ready for the last call 2-week period. After this =
period and unless notable objections are raised, the current document =
will be ratified as such. The current document can be found in the NANOG =
BCOP site -- link to current document found below:
>=20
> http://bcop.nanog.org/index.php/BCOP_Drafts
>=20
> Any additional community-wide comments or feedback in order to ensure =
quality documentation are not only very welcome but encouraged.
>=20
> Cheers,
>=20
> Yardiel Fuentes
>=20
>=20
> On Jul 2, 2014, at 6:48 PM, Yardiel D. Fuentes wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> OK NANOGers,
>>=20
>> Some of us got the call to arms from Chris G email below and the =
NANOG BCOP Committee and now we are interested in generating DoS =
attack-related Best Common Practices (BCOP) appeal to serve the entire =
NANOG community.
>>=20
>> This document, as other BCOP appeals are expected to be as brief as =
possible and to the point in order to keep it practical and useful.
>>=20
>> The goal is to generate a set of best practices of what to do =
before/during/after a DoS/DDoS attack -- including what seems to have =
worked best and what hasn't. Time dedicated to this effort should =
extensive and participation can be non-real-time given that it can be =
done over email with no need for conference calls if desired.
>>=20
>> DoS and DDoS attacks have been a topic that have captured high =
interest from NANOGers based on the archived list topics and email =
threads. So, now is your time to help shape a NANOG BCOP Appeal on this =
topic.
>>=20
>> Please contact me off-list if you want participate by either sharing =
your experience, expertise or opinions towards generating a DoS Attack =
BCOP.
>>=20
>>=20
>> Yardiel Fuentes
>> yardiel@gmail.com
>> twitter: #techguane
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On Jun 1, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Chris Grundemann wrote:
>>=20
>>> Hail NANOGers!
>>>=20
>>> As most of you hopefully know, NANOG now has a BCOP Ad Hoc Committee
>>> and we are pushing forward with new BCOPs!
>>> http://nanog.org/governance/bcop
>>>=20
>>> We currently have three BCOPs in active development:
>>>=20
>>> eBGP configuration, shepherd Bill Armstrong
>>> Public Peering Exchange update, shepherd Shawn Hsiao
>>> Ethernet OAM, shepherd Mark Calkins
>>>=20
>>> All three of these nascent BCOPs will be presented in the BCOP Track
>>> on Monday: http://nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=3D2348
>>>=20
>>> We have also collected a list of Appeals (BCOPs that need to be
>>> written): http://bcop.nanog.org/index.php/Appeals
>>>=20
>>> If you would like to help out with any of these BCOPs (or others yet
>>> to be identified) please join the BCOP mailing list and reach out to
>>> the shepherd (if applicable of course):
>>> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop
>>>=20
>>> Our committee is brand new and we are still finding and smoothing
>>> wrinkles, etc. We would love your help in any capacity. As a BCOP
>>> shepherd or SME or just to point out potential pit falls or room for
>>> improvement, with the process, the wiki, a BCOP or anything at all
>>> really.
>>>=20
>>> This is a bottom-up, community led effort and it will only succeed
>>> with your help - join us in creating what I believe will be a vital
>>> and long-lasting institution!
>>>=20
>>> Cheers,
>>> ~Chris
>>>=20
>>> --=20
>>> @ChrisGrundemann
>>> http://chrisgrundemann.com
>>=20
>=20
