[178970] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roland Dobbins)
Wed Mar 18 06:04:29 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:04:19 +0700
In-Reply-To: <D05A32F8-2500-4BFF-B985-7B2AF7344ADE@arbor.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


On 18 Mar 2015, at 17:00, Roland Dobbins wrote:

> This is not an optimal approach, and most providers are unlikely to =

> engage in such behavior due to its potential negative impact (I'm =

> assuming you mean via S/RTBH and/or flowspec).

Here's one counterexample:

<https://ripe68.ripe.net/presentations/176-RIPE68_JSnijders_DDoS_Damage_C=
ontrol.pdf>

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post