[1789] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Manning)
Thu Feb 1 12:51:47 1996
From: bmanning@ISI.EDU (Bill Manning)
To: jon@branch.com (Jon Zeeff)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 09:38:43 -0800 (PST)
Cc: curtis@ans.net, jon@branch.com, jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu,
G.Huston@aarnet.edu.au, asp@uunet.uu.net, cidrd@iepg.org, iesg@ISI.EDU,
local-ir@ripe.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <m0thzhv-000NiyC@aero.branch.com> from "Jon Zeeff" at Feb 1, 96 09:09:49 am
> Another factoid to consider - I know of a company that has a Class C that
> they don't use. To my knowledge, nobody has ever even asked that
> they give it up. Some automated email process could do this without
> much effort.
>
Well, almost. The IPGR robot is, in fact, doing just that.
As an aside, for my own private entertainment, I'm conducting
a straw poll.
If you beleive that prefix filtering is the right way to
address this problem:
or
If you beleive that prefix charging is the right way to
address this problem:
or
Gentle Renumbering requests will work.
Your selection to me in private mail. Door prizes at NANOG
for the attending participants.
--
--bill
